|
|
|
|
|
|
Presents a problem with the research, looks at ways to solve the problem, and discusses future research that could be conducted as a follow-up to this study
|
Presents a problem with research, considers one way to solve the problem
|
Presents a problem with the research but only describes how or if the researcher addressed the problem
|
Specific problem is stated, but is simplistic, obvious, and not solved
|
|
Information is taken from the source and used to interpret/evaluate the research, to develop a strategy to solve the study research design flaws
|
Information is taken from sources(s) and used to evaluate the research design
|
Information is taken from source(s) and includes minimal evaluation of the design
|
Information is taken from source without any evaluation of the design
|
|
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, with necessary details included
|
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated, and described, but needed details are missing
|
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated but is vague
|
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated but is not addressed further
|
|
Conclusions and related solutions to improve the research are logical and discussed in order of the scientific method
|
Conclusion is logically tied to the research study and the flaws addressed are clearly identified
|
Conclusion is logically tied to the research study
|
Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed
|