|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The site has a well-stated clear purpose and theme that is carried out throughout the site.
|
The site has a clearly stated purpose and theme, but may have one or two elements that do not seem to be related to it.
|
The purpose and theme of the site is somewhat muddy or vague.
|
The site lacks a purpose and theme.
|
|
|
All links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites.
|
Almost all links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites.
|
Most links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites.
|
Less than 3/4 of the links point to high quality, up-to-date, credible sites.
|
|
|
Partners show respect for one another's ideas, divide the work fairly, and show a commitment to quality work and support for each other.
|
Partners show respect for one another's ideas and divide the work fairly. There is commitment by some members toward quality work and support of one another.
|
Partners show respect for one another's ideas and divide the work fairly. There is little evidence of a commitment toward quality work in the group.
|
Partners argue or are disrepectful of other's ideas and input. Criticism is not constructive nor is support offered. The work is mostly done by one or two people.
|
|
|
The author has made an exceptional attempt to make the content of this Web site interesting to the people for whom it is intended.
|
The author has tried to make the content of this Web site interesting to the people for whom it is intended.
|
The author has put lots of information in the Web site but there is little evidence that the person tried to present the information in an interesting way.
|
The author has provided only the minimum amount of information and has not transformed the information to make it more interesting to the audience (e.g., has only provided a list of links to the content of others).
|
