RubiStar RubiStar
4 Teachers Tools
 RubiStar en Español     
Home | Find Rubric | Create Rubric | Login | Sign Up | Tutorial    
    Create Rubrics for your Project-Based Learning Activities

Print Page
Rubric ID: 1645910
Find out how to make this rubric interactive

    6+1 Trait Writing Model : ACT I, The Crucible. Scene Recreation


CATEGORY
4
3
2
1
IDEAS
*Clear and focused paper holds the reader’s attention * Ideas are fresh and original *Details are quality and go beyond the obvious and predictable *Ideas show insight and understanding of what is important
*Development is general and may be unfocused * Topic is recognizable but theme is not clear *More general observations than specific details *Ideas are reasonably clear there’s no strong sense of purpose
*Topic is yet undefined and development is basic *More information is needed for support *Ideas are not detailed enough to show understanding
*No clear sense of purpose or topic *Reader must infer meaning *Information and details are limited and unclear
ORGANIZATION
*Organization enhances the central idea and compels the reader through the text *Introduction and conclusion engage the reader and focus attention *Pacing, support, and transitions are controlled, logical, and effective
*Order moves the reader without confusion *Introduction and conclusion are present *Sequence is logical but “programmed” *Transitions and pacing are inconsistent *Organization doesn’t always support main idea
* Attempts at introduction and conclusion are recognizable *Connections are fuzzy *Sometimes the sequencing takes away from the content
*No clear sense of direction *Order seems random *Connections are missing *No real introduction or conclusion *Reader is confused
VOICE
*Writer is individual, compelling, and engaging *Person behind the words is honest and sincere *Strong commitment to topic is clear *Tone adds flavor and texture *Reader wants to share and talk about this piece *Many moments of surprise and delight
*Writer reveals personality and attitudes *Reader senses the person behind the words *Strong involvement with topic is evident *Some surprise and delight
*Writing is neither unique nor distinctive *Reads as though it could have been written by almost anybody *One or two moments of voice, but mostly generalities and vague language
*Writer is indifferent and uninvolved from topic and/or audience *Writing is lifeless and mechanical *Writing is functional and monotonous
WORD CHOICE
*Words are powerful and engaging, specific and accurate *Language is natural and effective * Writer has carefully chosen the precise word for the right spot *Striking words and phrases catch the reader’s eye
*Language lacks energy and precision *Words are adequate but without flair and originality *Occasional colorful language *Familiar words and phrases communicate but don’t engage
*Language is only functional *Words are generally used correctly *Attempts at original language seem like thesaurus overload *Jargon and cliches are present
*Language is vague and vocabulary is limited *Redundancy and incorrect word use distract the reader
SENTENCE FLUENCY
*Writing flows with rhythm and cadence *Purposeful and varied sentence structure enhances meaning *Writer has thought about the sound of the words as well as the meaning *Dialogue and fragments, if used, sound natural
*Writing has pleasant, steady beat *Sentences are usually grammatical but not well crafted *Some occasional variety in sentence structure
*More mechanical than fluid *Sentences are routine and unvaried *Writing is inconsistent with some awkward phrasing
*Sentences are choppy, incomplete, awkward, and unvaried *Even with editing, there would be no flow
CONVENTIONS
*Conventions are used effectively to enhance readability *Only minor “touch-up” is needed to publish *Conventions are used for stylistic effect *Paragraphing is effecting *Spelling of difficult words is usually correct
*Conventions are handled inconsistently *Paragraphing is awkward *Some errors are distracting but not serious *Spelling inconsistent *Moderate editing would fix most erro
*Conventions distort meaning *Many errors distract from readability *Difficult words often misspelled *Extensive editing required for publication *Paragraphing is attempted
*Errors repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read *Poor conventions are noticeable *Paragraphing is haphazard or missing *Extensive editing (every line) required

Date Created: November 04, 2008
Teachers.org QuizStar | TrackStar | NoteStar | Profiler Pro | More Tools RubiStar en Español | Contact Us | Terms of Use  
Copyright. © 2000-2008, ALTEC at University of Kansas