|
|
|
|
|
|
The song selected was carefully chosen and is appropriate for the time frame and the project.
|
The song portrays a historical event but was not specfically written to do so.
|
The song has little relevance to a historical event.
|
The song has no relevance to any historical event outlined in the project.
|
|
You go above and beyond to connect the song to various historical events.You are able to describe the song in terms of a historical movement.
|
A connection is made between the song and history.
|
A loose connection is made to a historical event. It is not convincing.
|
There is no connection made.
|
|
The paper that you write is pure quality. In addition, you portray that you fully understand the connection to the song and the historical event.
|
The paragraph is well written but the reader is not convinced of the analysis connecting the historical event to the song.
|
Poor quality paper. Not enough information to connect the song to the timeframe in history.
|
No paper is passed in.
|
|
Outstanding. Well rehearsed and you are confident with the information you present. Enthusiasm!
|
Good presentation, but not much enthusiasm.
|
Not taking your presentation seriously. Laughing, and / or not focusing on your presentation.
|
Presentation does not portray your understanding of the project. Or no presentation was given.
|