|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citation is not correct. 0 points.
|
Citation is not correct. 0 points
|
Citation is mostly correct. 4.5 points
|
Citation is correctly copied from case. 5 points
|
|
|
Demonstrates a poor understanding or no understanding of which facts are relevent to the decision. 3 points or less
|
Demonstrates a fair understanding of which facts are relevent to the decision. 3.5 points
|
Demonstrates a good understanding of which facts are relevent to the decision. 4 points
|
Demonstrates an excellent understanding of which facts are relevent to the decision. 4.5 -5 points
|
|
|
Demonstratesa poor understanding or no understanding of the issue(s). 3 points or less
|
Demonstratesa fair understanding of the issue(s) and in an understandable way. 3.5 points
|
Demonstrates a good understanding of the issue(s) and presents them well. 4 points
|
Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the issue(s) and presents them fully. 4.5-5 points
|
|
|
Demonstrates little or no understanding of the holding, makes little or no sense when read in light of the issue. 3 points or less
|
Demonstrates a fair understanding of the holding, somewhat makes sense when read in light of the issue. 3.5 points
|
Demonstrates a good understanding of the holding, makes sense when read in light of the issue. 4 points
|
Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the holding, makes sense when read in light of the issue. 4.5-5 points
|
|
|
Demonstrates a poor or no understanding of court's rationale. 3 points or less
|
Demonstrates a fair understanding of court's rationale, expresses it clearly. 3.5 points
|
Demonstrates a good understanding of court's rationale, expresses it well. 4 points
|
Demonstrates an excellent understanding of court's rationale, expresses it clearly. 4.5-5 points
|
|