|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project includes all material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the topic. It is a highly effective study guide.
|
Project includes most material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the material but is lacking one or two key elements. It is an adequate study guide.
|
Project is missing more than two key elements. It would make an incomplete study guide.
|
Project is lacking several key elements and has inaccuracies that make it a poor study guide.
|
|
|
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors but no misspellings.
|
Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors.
|
|
|
Background and sound does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of backgroundfrom card to card and is appropriate for the topic.
|
Background and sound mostly does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of backgroundfrom card to card and is appropriate for the topic in most cases.
|
Background and sound detracts from text or other graphics. Though some consideration evident.
|
Background makes it difficult to see text or competes with other graphics on the page. Sound distracting or hard to hear.
|
|
|
Project includes all material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the topic. It is a highly effective study guide.
|
Project includes most material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the material but is lacking one or two key elements. It is an adequate study guide.
|
Project is missing more than two key elements. It would make an incomplete study guide.
|
Project is lacking several key elements and has inaccuracies that make it a poor study guide.
|
|
|
All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
A few graphics are not attractive but all support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation.
|
|
|
All graphics and information cited in bibliography. MLA format is used correctly.
|
All graphics and information cited in bibliography. MLA format is used correctly in most cases.
|
few graphics and information cited in bibliography. MLA format is not used correctly or frequent mistakes.
|
No or almost no sources cited in bibliography. MLA format is not used correctly. Bibliography not evident.
|
|
|
Presentation shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way.
|
Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way.
|
Presentation shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on 1-2 cards.
|
Presentation is a rehash of other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought.
|
|
|
Appropriate use and number of slides.
|
Mostly appropriate use and number of slides.
|
Too few slides or slides not used effectively.
|
Way too few or very notably ineffective slides.
|
