|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Describes developmental progression citing health,educational experiences and sociocultural environment using appropriate references and Erikson's Stages of Development.
|
Effective presentation. Relevant details and anecdotes enriched the information given.
|
Basic development of topic. Ideas were reasonably clear. Thoughts personalized but adequate detail not provided.
|
Paper showed no clear sense of purpose. Difficult to find meaningful details related to the topic. Mundane description of life events.
|
|
|
|
Identifies the comprehensive influences of health status on development.
|
Development of topic was clear and focused. Had insight into the significance of influences on development.
|
Influences on development presented in reasonable manner although there might have been expanded detail and personalization.
|
In adequate discussion of the influences on development presented.
|
|
|
|
Idenitifies the comprehensive influences of educational experiences on development.
|
Development of topic was clear and focused. Had insight into the significance of influences on development.
|
Influences on development presented in clear but fairly broad manner. Might have included more detail and personalization.
|
Inadequate discussion of the influences on development presented.
|
|
|
|
Identifies the comprehensive influences of the sociocultural environment on development.
|
Development of topic was clear and focused. Had insight into the significance of influences on development.
|
Influences on development presented in clear but general manner. Might have expanded detail and added more personal information.
|
In adequate discussion of the influences on development presented.
|
|
|
|
Develop content in ordered way. Arranges ideas in logical sequence and transition of thoughts as expected of a university student.
|
Transitions were thoughtful and orderly.Sequenceslogical and effective. Central theme of each stage presented in engaging way.
|
Organizational structure moved reader through, some confusion in transitioning from one thought to another. Logical sequencing.
|
Writing lacked clear sense of direction. Poor organization with confusing transition and sequencing of thoughts.
|
|
|
|
Sentences, parts of speech, grammar, vocabulary, and punctuation meets standards of university student. Adheres to APA format.
|
Words were lively and engaging. Natural effective phrasing with accurate grammar and punctuation. APA format noted.
|
Language correct. Attempts at colorful wording. Sequencing shows some logic and often transitions clear. Grammar and punctuation errors minor. APA format noted.
|
Sentences choppy, incomplete. Many grammatical and spelling errors. Language used incorrectly at times. Attempt at APA format noted.
|
|
