|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is supported by detailed information.
|
Main idea is clear but the supporting information is general.
|
Main idea is somewhat clear but there is a need for more supporting information.
|
The main idea is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information.
|
|
|
The writer seems to be writing from knowledge or experience. The author has taken the ideas and made them "his own."
|
The writer seems to be drawing on knowledge or experience, but there is some lack of ownership of the topic.
|
The writer relates some of his own knowledge or experience, but it adds nothing to the discussion of the topic.
|
The writer has not tried to transform the information in a personal way. The ideas and the way they are expressed seem to belong to someone else.
|
|
|
All supportive facts are reported accurately.
|
Almost all supportive facts are reported accurately.
|
Most supportive facts are reported accurately.
|
NO facts are reported OR most are inaccurately reported.
|
|
|
Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader.
|
Details are placed in a logical order, but the way in which they are presented/introduced sometimes makes the writing less interesting.
|
Some details are not in a logical or expected order, and this distracts the reader.
|
Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized.
|
|
|
Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind, and the choice and placement of the words seems accurate, natural and not forced.
|
Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind, but occasionally the words are used inaccurately or seem overdone.
|
Writer uses words that communicate clearly, but the writing lacks variety, punch or flair.
|
Writer uses a limited vocabulary that does not communicate strongly or capture the reader's interest. Jargon or cliches may be present and detract from the meaning.
|
|
|
All sentences sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud. Each sentence is clear and has an obvious emphasis.
|
Almost all sentences sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud, but 1 or 2 are stiff and awkward or difficult to understand.
|
Most sentences sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud, but several are stiff and awkward or are difficult to understand.
|
The sentences are difficult to read aloud because they sound awkward, are distractingly repetitive, or difficult to understand.
|
|
|
Journal is neatly written or typed with no distracting corrections.
|
Journal is neatly written or typed with 1 or 2 distracting corrections (e.g.,dark cross-outs; bumpy white-out, words written over).
|
The writing is generally readable, but the reader has to exert quite a bit of effort to figure out some of the words.
|
Many words are unreadable OR there are several distracting corrections.
|
|
|
Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
|
|
All sources used for quotes and facts are credible and cited correctly.
|
All sources used for quotes and facts are credible and most are cited correctly.
|
Most sources used for quotes and facts are credible and cited correctly.
|
Many sources used for quotes and facts are less than credible (suspect) and/or are not cited correctly.
|
|
|
The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is "getting at."
|
The conclusion is recognizable and ties up almost all the loose ends.
|
The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up several loose ends.
|
There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends.
|
