|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanation shows complete understanding of the mathematical concepts used to solve the problem(s).
|
Explanation shows substantial understanding of the mathematical concepts used to solve the problem(s).
|
Explanation shows some understanding of the mathematical concepts needed to solve the problem(s).
|
Explanation shows very limited understanding of the underlying concepts needed to solve the problem(s) OR is not written.
|
|
|
Student was an engaged partner, listening to suggestions of others and working cooperatively throughout lesson.
|
Student was an engaged partner but had trouble listening to others and/or working cooperatively.
|
Student cooperated with others, but needed prompting to stay on-task.
|
Student did not work effectively with others.
|
|
|
Correct terminology and notation are always used, making it easy to understand what was done.
|
Correct terminology and notation are usually used, making it fairly easy to understand what was done.
|
Correct terminology and notation are used, but it is sometimes not easy to understand what was done.
|
There is little use, or a lot of inappropriate use, of terminology and notation.
|
|
|
Explanation is detailed and clear.
|
Explanation is clear.
|
Explanation is a little difficult to understand, but includes critical components.
|
Explanation is difficult to understand and is missing several components OR was not included.
|
|
|
Presentation had all required components and was visually pleasing.
|
Presentation had all required components, but lacked transitions and appropriate graphics.
|
Presentation was hard to read or follow.
|
Presentation did not have all required components
|
