|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume is loud enough to be heard by all audience members throughout the presentation.
|
Volume is loud enough to be heard by all audience members at least 90% of the time.
|
Volume is loud enough to be heard by all audience members at least 80% of the time.
|
Volume often too soft to be heard by all audience members.
|
|
Pitch was often used and it conveyed emotions appropriately.
|
Pitch was often used but the emotion it conveyed sometimes did not fit the content.
|
Pitch was rarely used OR the emotion it conveyed often did not fit the content.
|
Pitch was not used to convey emotion.
|
|
Student is completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed.
|
Student seems pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals.
|
The student is somewhat prepared, but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking.
|
Student does not seem at all prepared to present.
|
|
Stands up straight, looks relaxed and confident. Establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation.
|
Stands up straight and establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation.
|
Sometimes stands up straight and establishes eye contact.
|
Slouches and/or does not look at people during the presentation.
|
|
You used your notes as cues, not cruches, which added to your credibility and our involvement. Your eye contact was excellent in all areas of the room.
|
YOu need to rely less on your notes and/or make better use of eye contact to enhance your message and stay connected with your audience. Establishes eye contact with some peole in the room during the presentation.
|
YOu appeared to be reading to us a significant part of the time and/or had little eye contact.
|
You did not establish contact with anyone in the room during the presentation.
|
|
Presentation is 4 minutes long.
|
Presentation is 3 minutes long.
|
Presentation is 2 minutes long.
|
Presentation is less than 2 minutes OR more than 4 minutes.
|
|
The speaker clearly establishes the occasion and purpose of the speech, grabs the audience\\\\\\'s attention and makes the audience want to listen.
|
The speaker introduced the speech adequately, including an attention getter and established the occasion and purpose of the speech.
|
The speaker introduced the topic, but did not clearly establish the occasion and/or purpose of the speech. Weak attention getter.
|
The speaker failed to introduce the speech. Or, the introduction was not useful in indicating what the speech was about.
|
|
Your organizational pattern and transitions made your speech easy to follow.
|
You need to make your main points more clear; reorganize or chunk some of your information so it is easier to follow and remember and/or give us stronger cues.
|
Your organizational pattern and/or transitions were unclear, making it difficult for us to follow and understand.
|
Your speech was disorganized and difficult to follow.
|
|
Your conclusion emphasized your main points(s) and drew your speech to a close with an effective memorable statement.
|
You had a start on a conclusion, but still need a _______________
|
You need to bring your speech to a close by summarizing or reminding us of your main points.
|
Your speech ends abruptly and does not summarize your main points.
|
|
Your rehtorical support (illustraiosn, examples, etc.) and or visual suppoort was effective in making your point (s).
|
Your support was useful, but you needed ________________
|
Your support was weak. You needed ______________
|
You had no rhetorical support.
|
|
You wrote out the entire speech.
|
You wrote out 2/3\\\\\\'s of the speech.
|
You wrote out 1/3 of the speech.
|
You did not write out the speech.
|
|
You wrote an outline for the entire speech.
|
You wrote out 2/3\\\\\\'s of the outline of the speech.
|
You wrote out 1/3 of the speech.
|
You did not write an outline of the speech.
|
|
Fills out peer evaluation completely and always gives scores based on the presentation rather than other factors (e.g. person is a close friend).
|
Fills out almost all of the peer evaluation and always gives scores based on the presentation (rather than other factors (e.g., person is a close friend).
|
Fills out most of the peer evaluation and always gives scores based on the presentation rather than other factors (e.g., person is a close friend.
|
Fills out most of the peer evaluation but scoring appears to be biased.
|
|
|
|
|
|