|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accurate with very occasional slips.
|
Largely accurate to communicate meaning clearly.
|
Sufficiently accurate.
|
Serious errors and hamper reading.
|
|
|
Accurate-writer makes no errors in capitalization and punctuation.
|
Largely accurate-writer makes 1-2 errors in capitalization and punctuation.
|
Nearly always accurate-writer makes 3-4 errors in capitalization and punctuation.
|
Falters-writer makes more than 4 errors in capitalization and punctuation.
|
|
|
Accurate-writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling.
|
Largely accurate-writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar and/or spelling.
|
Nearly always accurate-writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar and/or spelling
|
Mostly inaccurate-writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar and/or spelling.
|
|
|
Apt and widely used.
|
Widely used but lack of precision.
|
Sufficient use of vocabulary.
|
Limited use of vocabulary.
|
|
|
Varied and well-constructed.
|
Show some variation and well-constructed.
|
Simple structure-majority simple sentences.
|
Simple and very often repetitive.
|
|
|
Able to use at least 5 formulaic expressions of greetings in salutation and closing.
|
Able to use at least 3 formulaic expressions of greetings in salutation and closing
|
Able to use at least 1 formulaic expressions of greetings in salutation and closing
|
Salutation and/or closing are missing.
|
|
|
Ideas were expressed in a clear and organized fashion. It was easy to figure out what the introduction was about.
|
Ideas were expressed in a pretty clear manner, but the organization could have been better.
|
Ideas were somewhat organized, but were not very clear. It took more than one reading to figure out what the introduction was about.
|
The letter seemed to be a collection of unrelated sentences. It was very difficult to figure out what the introduction was about.
|
