|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The relationship between the variables is discussed and trends/patterns logically analyzed. Predictions are made about what might happen if part of the lab were changed or how the experimental design could be changed.
|
The relationship between the variables is discussed and trends/patterns logically analyzed.
|
The relationship between the variables is discussed but no patterns, trends or predictions are made based on the data.
|
The relationship between the variables is not discussed.
|
|
|
Used time well in lab and focused attention on the experiment.
|
Used time pretty well. Stayed focused on the experiment most of the time.
|
Did the lab but did not appear very interested. Focus was lost on several occasions.
|
Participation was minimal OR student was hostile about participating.
|
|
|
Professional looking and accurate representation of the data in tables and/or graphs. Graphs and tables are labeled and titled.
|
Accurate representation of the data in tables and/or graphs. Graphs and tables are labeled and titled.
|
Accurate representation of the data in written form, but no graphs or tables are presented.
|
Data are not shown OR are inaccurate.
|
|
|
Report illustrates an accurate and thorough understanding of scientific concepts underlying the lab.
|
Report illustrates an accurate understanding of most scientific concepts underlying the lab.
|
Report illustrates a limited understanding of scientific concepts underlying the lab.
|
Report illustrates inaccurate understanding of scientific concepts underlying the lab.
|
|
|
Clear, accurate, dated notes are taken regularly.
|
Dated, clear, accurate notes are taken occassionally.
|
Dated, notes are taken occassionally, but accuracy of notes might be questionable.
|
Notes rarely taken or of little use.
|
