|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classroom time was used to work on the project. Conversations were not disruptive and focused on the work.
|
Classroom time was used to work on the project the majority of the time. Conversations were not disruptive and focused on the work.
|
Classroom time was used to work on the project the majority of the time, but conversations often were disruptive or did not focus on the work.
|
Student did not use classroom time to work on the project and/or was highly disruptive.
|
|
|
Explanation of turning points are complete and convincing. Event may include two points but taken together they make sense.
|
Explanations are convincing. Student(s) focus on one event at the expense of others, thus making it too abbreviated.
|
Explanations are too brief for at least one. Overly simplifies event selected without looking at its over-all effect on the outcome of the war.
|
Explanations of turning points are consistently brief. Student(s) demonstrate little understanding of the war.
|
|
|
The timeline contained at least 8-10 events related to the topic being studied.
|
The timeline contained at least 6-7 events related to the topic being studied.
|
The timeline contained at least 5 events related to the topic being studied.
|
The timeline contained fewer than 5 events.
|
|
|
Facts were accurate for all events reported on the timeline.
|
Facts were accurate for almost all events reported on the timeline.
|
Facts were accurate for most (~75%) of the events reported on the timeline.
|
Facts were often inaccurate for events reported on the timeline.
|