|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content.
|
Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability.
|
Font formatting has been carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read.
|
Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material.
|
|
|
All content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors.
|
Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that might be inaccurate.
|
The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate.
|
Content is typically confusing or contains more than one factual error.
|
|
|
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors but no misspellings.
|
Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors.
|
|
|
All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
A few graphics are not attractive but all support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation.
|
|
|
Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is consistent from card to card and is appropriate for the topic.
|
Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is consistent from card to card.
|
Background does not detract from text or other graphics.
|
Background makes it difficult to see text or competes with other graphics on the page.
|
