|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive. Presentation is unique.
|
Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights. Presentation shows some unique qualities.
|
Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking.
|
Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit.
|
|
|
Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material.
|
Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed.
|
Content is logically organized for the most part.
|
There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.
|
|
|
Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. All content requirements are met.
|
Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Most content requirements are met.
|
Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. Only a couple requirements are met.
|
Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. No content requirements are met.
|
|
|
Video holds audience attention and was well put together.
|
Video was thought out, but at times had a couple choppy spots.
|
Video contained choppy spots and was not very well put together.
|
Video was not put together well and shows that it was put together at the last minute.
|
