|
|
|
|
|
|
There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is supported by detailed information.
|
Main idea is clear but the supporting information is general.
|
Main idea is somewhat clear but there is a need for more supporting information.
|
The main idea is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information.
|
|
Relevant, telling, quality details give the reader important information that goes beyond the obvious or predictable.
|
Supporting details and information are relevant, but one key issue or portion of the storyline is unsupported.
|
Supporting details and information are relevant, but several key issues or portions of the storyline are unsupported.
|
Supporting details and information are typically unclear or not related to the topic.
|
|
All supportive facts are reported accurately.
|
Almost all supportive facts are reported accurately.
|
Most supportive facts are reported accurately.
|
NO facts are reported OR most are inaccurately reported.
|
|
The introduction is inviting, states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper.
|
The introduction clearly states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper, but is not particularly inviting to the reader.
|
The introduction states the main topic, but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper nor is it particularly inviting to the reader.
|
There is no clear introduction of the main topic or structure of the paper.
|
|
All sentences are well-constructed with varied structure.
|
Most sentences are well-constructed with varied structure.
|
Most sentences are well-constructed but have a similar structure.
|
Sentences lack structure and appear incomplete or rambling.
|
|
Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
|
Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind, and the choice and placement of the words seems accurate, natural and not forced.
|
Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind, but occasionally the words are used inaccurately or seem overdone.
|
Writer uses words that communicate clearly, but the writing lacks variety, punch or flair.
|
Writer uses a limited vocabulary that does not communicate strongly or capture the reader's interest. Jargon or cliches may be present and detract from the meaning.
|
|
All sources used for quotes and facts are credible and cited correctly.
|
All sources used for quotes and facts are credible and most are cited correctly.
|
Most sources used for quotes and facts are credible and cited correctly.
|
Many sources used for quotes and facts are less than credible (suspect) and/or are not cited correctly.
|
|
The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is "getting at."
|
The conclusion is recognizable and ties up almost all the loose ends.
|
The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up several loose ends.
|
There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends.
|