|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant, telling, quality details give the reader important information that goes beyond the obvious or predictable.
|
Supporting details and information are relevant, but one key issue or portion of the storyline is unsupported.
|
Supporting details and information are relevant, but several key issues or portions of the storyline are unsupported.
|
Supporting details and information are typically unclear or not related to the topic.
|
|
Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind, and the choice and placement of the words seems accurate, natural and not forced.
|
Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind, but occasionally the words are used inaccurately or seem overdone.
|
Writer uses words that communicate clearly, but the writing lacks variety, punch or flair.
|
Writer uses a limited vocabulary that does not communicate strongly or capture the reader's interest. Jargon or cliches may be present and detract from the meaning.
|
|
The introduction is inviting, states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper.
|
The introduction clearly states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper, but is not particularly inviting to the reader.
|
The introduction states the main topic, but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper nor is it particularly inviting to the reader.
|
There is no clear introduction of the main topic or structure of the paper.
|
|
A variety of thoughtful transitions are used. They clearly show how ideas are connected.
|
Transitions clearly show how ideas are connected, but there is little variety.
|
Some transitions work well; but connections between other ideas are fuzzy.
|
The transitions between ideas are unclear or nonexistant.
|
|
Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader.
|
Details are placed in a logical order, but the way in which they are presented/introduced sometimes makes the writing less interesting.
|
Some details are not in a logical or expected order, and this distracts the reader.
|
Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized.
|
|
All sentences are well-constructed with varied structure.
|
Most sentences are well-constructed with varied structure.
|
Most sentences are well-constructed but have a similar structure.
|
Sentences lack structure and appear incomplete or rambling.
|
|
The writer seems to be writing from knowledge or experience. The author has taken the ideas and made them "his own."
|
The writer seems to be drawing on knowledge or experience, but there is some lack of ownership of the topic.
|
The writer relates some of his own knowledge or experience, but it adds nothing to the discussion of the topic.
|
The writer has not tried to transform the information in a personal way. The ideas and the way they are expressed seem to belong to someone else.
|
|
The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is "getting at."
|
The conclusion is recognizable and ties up almost all the loose ends.
|
The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up several loose ends.
|
There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends.
|
|
Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|