|
|
|
|
|
|
Catchy and clever introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a purpose engaging the listener immediately.
|
Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.
|
Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose.
|
Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction.
|
|
Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.
|
Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
|
Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors.
|
Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors.
|
|
Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention.
|
Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time.
|
Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time.
|
Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost.
|
|
Script brought on due date. Group extensively edits based on feedback.
|
Script brought on due date. Group makes some edits.
|
Script was late. Few edits made.
|
Script was not submitted.
|
|
No misspellings or grammatical errors.
|
Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors.
|
Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
|
More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar.
|
|
Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive.
|
Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights.
|
Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking.
|
Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit.
|
|
The workload is divided and shared equally by all team members.
|
The workload is divided and shared fairly by all team members, though workloads may vary from person to person.
|
The workload was divided, but one person in the group is viewed as not doing his/her fair share of the work.
|
The workload was not divided OR several people in the group are viewed as not doing their fair share of the work.
|