|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meets the required amount of time with no prompting
|
Falls within the established time limit with some prompting
|
Does not meet the minimum time limit or requires frequent prompting
|
|
|
|
Speech is well planned, flows from topic to topic in a logical manner
|
A general outline is being followed, occasionally veers from the topic
|
Speech rambles, is hard to follow, appears to be a series of disjointed statements
|
Has no organization
|
|
|
Student is completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed.
|
Student seems pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals.
|
The student is somewhat prepared, but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking.
|
Student does not seem at all prepared to present.
|
|
|
Shows a full understanding of the topic.
|
Shows a good understanding of the topic.
|
Shows a good understanding of parts of the topic.
|
Does not seem to understand the topic very well.
|
|
|
Volume is loud enough to be heard by all audience members throughout the presentation.
|
Volume is loud enough to be heard by all audience members at least 90% of the time.
|
Volume is loud enough to be heard by all audience members at least 80% of the time.
|
Volume often too soft to be heard by all audience members.
|
|
|
Stands up straight, looks relaxed and confident. Establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation.
|
Stands up straight and establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation.
|
Sometimes stands up straight and establishes eye contact.
|
Slouches and/or does not look at people during the presentation.
|
|
|
Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100-95%) the time, and mispronounces no words.
|
Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100-95%) the time, but mispronounces one word.
|
Speaks clearly and distinctly most ( 94-85%) of the time. Mispronounces no more than one word.
|
Often mumbles or can not be understood OR mispronounces more than one word.
|
|
|
Only the expected pauses at the end of the sentences, uses pauses correctly for effect
|
A few pauses in odd places, some noticable extras....ums, wells...etc.
|
Too many or extended pauses to figure where to go next, excessive extras
|
Pauses were not intentionally used. Likes/ Ums used throughout the majority of the report
|
|
|
Appropriately uses the required amount of slides, contains appropriate explaination
|
Uses the required amount of slides, vague explaination
|
does not use the required amount of slides, but does offer some explaination
|
Does not meet the requirements
|
|
|
Clearly ties to topic, enhances presentation, makes it easier for audience to understand material
|
Has a relationship to the material being presented, does not take away from presentation
|
Hard to link to the topic, distracting, takes away from the presentation
|
|
|
|
Effectively incorporates the character throughout the entire presentation
|
The characterl is incorporated throughout the most of the presentation
|
The Character not incorporated into presentation, seems detatched
|
Inadequate use of character
|
|
|
Very polished, Goes beyond the requirements contained in the guidelines
|
Room for small improvements, meets the requirements contained in the guidelines
|
Sloppy, appears to be thrown together, does not meet the requirements contained in the guidelines
|
|
|
|
Overall project shows planning and hard work
|
Shows some planning, appears to need more attention to detail
|
Shows little to no planning
|
|
|
|
Always (99-100% of time) speaks in complete sentences.
|
Mostly (80-98%) speaks in complete sentences.
|
Sometimes (70-80%) speaks in complete sentences.
|
Rarely speaks in complete sentences.
|
|
|
No errors
|
few errors
|
Multiple errors
|
Majority of errors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
