|
|
|
|
|
|
The group/individual put a lot of thought into making the game interesting and fun to play as shown by creative questions, game pieces and/or game board layout.
|
The group/individual put some thought into making the game interesting and fun to play by using textures, fancy writing, and/or interesting characters.
|
The group/individual tried to make the game interesting and fun, but some of the things made it harder to understand/enjoy the game.
|
Little thought was put into making the game interesting or fun.
|
|
Rules were written clearly enough that all could easily participate.
|
Rules were written, but one part of the game needed slightly more explanation.
|
Rules were written, but people had some difficulty figuring out the game.
|
The rules were not written.
|
|
Professional functioning gameshow. Graphics move when they are to move and are locked into place when needed. There are obvious links to move through the gameshow that always work and scrolling through pages is not needed.
|
Clear functioning gameshow. There may be a graphic that is mis-moved or not locked into place. There are obvious links but they may not always take the player back where needed. Some scrolling is required.
|
Some functioning errors make the gameshow confusing for the player. Too many graphics move around when the player touches the board. Links don't go to the correct pages and scrolling is mostly required to get back to the correct page.
|
The is no clear picture of a beginning, middle or end to the gameshow. Graphics constanly move and make the game difficult to play. Constant scrolling is required to move through various pages of the gameshow.
|
|
Contrasting colors and 3+ original graphics were used to give the gameboard visual appeal.
|
Contrasting colors and 1-2 original graphic were used to give the gameboard visual appeal.
|
Contrasting colors and "borrowed" graphics were used to give the gameboard visual appeal.
|
Little or no color or fewer than 3 graphics were included.
|
|
WOW! Colors, graphics, layout and text all conform together to create an experience when playing the game.
|
Very good. Colors, graphics, layout and text are visually appealing to the audience.
|
Satisfactory. Most colors, graphics, layout and text are visually appealing to the audience but could be spiced up more.
|
Needs improvement. There was little color, graphics, layout or text that drew the audience into the game.
|
|
The game had players and all audience members involved for the entire game.
|
Th game had players and most audience members involved for the game.
|
The game had players and few audience members involved in the game.
|
The game could only be understood by the players or the makers of the game.
|
|
The group worked well together with all members contributing significant amounts of quality work.
|
The group generally worked well together with all members contributing some quality work.
|
The group worked fairly well together with all members contributing some work.
|
The group often did not work well together and the game appeared to be the work of only 1-2 students in the group.
|