|
|
|
|
|
|
All content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors.
|
Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that might be inaccurate.
|
The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate.
|
Content is typically confusing or contains more than one factual error.
|
|
Condition identified as sex-linked, dominant or recessive and a detailed explanation why it is this type is made.
|
Condition identified as sex-linked, dominant or recessive and a brief explanation why it is this type is made.
|
Condition is identified as to type, but no explanation is made.
|
No reference made to the genetic disorder's type.
|
|
Many symptoms and treatments options provided using understable terms. Original Work.
|
Several symptoms and treatments options given. Mostly original work.
|
A few symptoms and treatment options provided, understanding of information is not established.
|
Minimal number of symptoms and treatment options given. Unoriginal work.
|
|
Interesting, well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention.
|
Relatively interesting, rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention.
|
Delivery not smooth, but able to able to hold audience attention most of the time.
|
Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost.
|
|
Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. 6x6 format applied to all slides.
|
Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. 6x6 format applied to most slides.
|
Content is logically organized for the most part. 6x6 format applied occasionally.
|
There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. No 6x6 format
|
|
Information is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of material that might be on the next card.
|
Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. One card or item of information seems out of place.
|
Some information is logically sequenced. An occasional card or item of information seems out of place.
|
There is no clear plan for the organization of information.
|
|
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors but no misspellings.
|
Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors.
|
|
Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content.
|
Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability.
|
Font formatting has been carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read.
|
Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material.
|
|
All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
A few graphics are not attractive but all support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation.
|