|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough.
|
Most information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough.
|
Most information presented in the debate was clear and accurate, but was not usually thorough.
|
Information had several inaccuracies OR was usually not clear.
|
|
|
Every major point was well supported with several relevant facts, statistics and/or examples.
|
Every major point was adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples.
|
Every major point was supported with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable.
|
Every point was not supported.
|
|
|
All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion.
|
Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion.
|
All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) but the organization was sometimes not clear or logical.
|
Arguments were not clearly tied to an idea (premise).
|
|
|
He/she clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented their information forcefully and convincingly.
|
He/she clearly undestood the topic in-depth and presented their information with ease.
|
He/she team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with ease.
|
He/she did not show an adequate understanding of the topic.
|
