|
|
|
|
|
|
It is very easy for the reader to understand the problem the main characters face and why it is a problem.
|
It is fairly easy for the reader to understand the problem the main characters face and why it is a problem.
|
It is fairly easy for the reader to understand the problem the main characters face but it is not clear why it is a problem.
|
It is not clear what problem the main characters face.
|
|
Many vivid, descriptive words are used to tell when and where the situation took place.
|
Some vivid, descriptive words are used to tell the audience when and where the situation took place.
|
The reader can figure out when and where the situation took place, but the author didn't supply much detail.
|
The reader has trouble figuring out when and where the situation took place.
|
|
The essay is very well organized. One idea or scene follows another in a logical sequence with clear transitions.
|
The essay is pretty well organized. One idea or scene may seem out of place. Clear transitions are used.
|
The essay is a little hard to follow. The transitions are sometimes not clear.
|
Ideas and scenes seem to be randomly arranged.
|
|
The solution suggestion to the characters' problem is easy to understand, and is logical.
|
The solution suggestion to the characters' problem is easy to understand, and is somewhat logical.
|
The solution suggestion to the characters' problem is a little hard to understand.
|
No solution suggestion is attempted or it is impossible to understand.
|
|
There is one spelling or punctuation error in the final draft. Character and place names that the author used are spelled consistently throughout.
|
There are very few spelling or punctuation errors in the final draft.
|
There are 3-5 spelling and punctuation errors in the final draft.
|
The final draft has more than 5 spelling and punctuation errors.
|