|
|
|
|
|
|
Rules can be easily read (very neat) and describes the content very well.
|
Rules can be read fairly easily and mostly describes the content well.
|
Rules can be read, though not neatly written, and describes content somewhat.
|
The title is too messy and/or does not describe the content of the poster well.
|
|
All graphics are related to the topic and make it easier to understand.
|
All graphics are related to the topic and mostly make it easier to understand.
|
All graphics relate to the topic.
|
Graphics do not relate to the topic.
|
|
The poster includes all required elements as well as additional information. (name, title, artwork)
|
All required elements are included on the poster.
|
All but 1 of the required elements are included on the poster.
|
More than 1 of the required elements were missing.
|
|
Student can accurately answer questions related to facts in the poster and processes used to create the poster.
|
Student can accurately answer most questions related to facts in the poster.
|
Student can accurately answer about some questions related to facts in the poster .
|
Student appears to have insufficient knowledge about the facts.
|
|
The poster is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness.
|
The poster is attractive in terms of design, layout and neatness.
|
The poster is acceptably attractive though it may be a bit messy.
|
The poster is distractingly messy or very poorly designed. It is not attractive.
|
|
Capitalization and punctuation are correct throughout the poster.
|
There is 1 error in capitalization or punctuation.
|
There are 2 errors in capitalization or punctuation.
|
There are more than 2 errors in capitalization or punctuation.
|