|
|
|
|
|
|
All historical information appeared to be accurate and in chronological order.
|
Almost all historical information appeared to be accurate and in chronological order.
|
Most of the historical information was accurate and in chronological order.
|
Very little of the historical information was accurate and/or in chronological order.
|
|
Point-of-view, arguments, and solutions proposed were consistently in character.
|
Point-of-view, arguments, and solutions proposed were often in character.
|
Point-of-view, arguments, and solutions proposed were sometimes in character.
|
Point-of-view, arguments, and solutions proposed were rarely in character.
|
|
Can clearly explain several ways in which his character "saw" things differently than other characters and can clearly explain why.
|
Can clearly explain several ways in which his character "saw" things differently than other characters.
|
Can clearly explain one way in which his character "saw" things differently than other characters.
|
Cannot explain one way in which his character "saw" things differently than other characters.
|
|
Student included more information than was required.
|
Student included all information that was required.
|
Student included most information that was required.
|
Student included less information than was required.
|
|
Student uses several props (could include costume) that accurately fit the period, show considerable work/creativity and make the presentation better.
|
Student uses 1-2 props that accurately fit the period, and make the presentation better.
|
Student uses 1-2 props which make the presentation better.
|
The student uses no props OR the props chosen detract from the presentation.
|