|
|
|
|
|
|
First paragraph has a "grabber" or catchy beginning.
|
First paragraph has a weak "grabber".
|
A catchy beginning was attempted but was confusing rather than catchy.
|
No attempt was made to catch the reader's attention in the first paragraph.
|
|
The entire case is related to the assigned topic and allows the reader to understand much more about the topic.
|
Most of the case is related to the assigned topic. The case wanders off at one point, but the reader can still learn something about the topic.
|
Some of the case is related to the assigned topic, but a reader does not learn much about the topic.
|
No attempt has been made to relate the case to the assigned topic.
|
|
The case is very well organized. One idea or scene follows another in a logical sequence with clear transitions.
|
The case is pretty well organized. One idea or scene may seem out of place. Clear transitions are used.
|
The case is a little hard to follow. The transitions are sometimes not clear.
|
Ideas and scenes seem to be randomly arranged.
|
|
There are no spelling or punctuation errors in the final draft. Character and place names that the author invented are spelled consistently throughout.
|
There is one spelling or punctuation error in the final draft.
|
There are 2-3 spelling and punctuation errors in the final draft.
|
The final draft has more than 3 spelling and punctuation errors.
|
|
All facts presented in the case are accurate. That is, if you describe a child with a disability it accurately reflects that disability and the related characteristics.
|
Almost all facts presented in the story are accurate.
|
Most facts presented in the story are accurate (at least 70%).
|
There are several factual errors in the story.
|
|
Many vivid, descriptive words are used to tell when and where the case took place.
|
Some vivid, descriptive words are used to tell the audience when and where the case took place.
|
The reader can figure out when and where the case took place, but the author didn't supply much detail.
|
The reader has trouble figuring out when and where the case took place.
|
|
It is very easy for the reader to understand the problem the main characters face and why it is a problem.
|
It is fairly easy for the reader to understand the problem the main characters face and why it is a problem.
|
It is fairly easy for the reader to understand the problem the main characters face but it is not clear why it is a problem.
|
It is not clear what problem the main characters face.
|
|
All of the written requirements were met.
|
Almost all (about 90%) the written requirements were met.
|
Most (about 75%) of the written requirements were met, but several were not.
|
Many requirements were not met.
|
|
The main characters are named and clearly described in text. Most readers could describe the characters accurately.
|
The main characters are named and described. Most readers would have some idea of what the characters looked like.
|
The main characters are named. The reader knows very little about the characters.
|
It is hard to tell who the main characters are.
|
|
Title is creative, sparks interest and is related to the case and topic.
|
Title is related to the case and topic.
|
Title is present, but does not appear to be related to the case and topic.
|
No title.
|