|
|
|
|
|
|
The introduction is inviting, states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper.
|
The introduction clearly states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper, but is not particularly inviting to the reader.
|
The introduction states the main topic, but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper nor is it particularly inviting to the reader.
|
There is no clear introduction of the main topic or structure of the paper.
|
|
Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
|
All sentences sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud. Each sentence is clear and has an obvious emphasis.
|
Almost all sentences sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud, but 1 or 2 are stiff and awkward or difficult to understand.
|
Most sentences sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud, but several are stiff and awkward or are difficult to understand.
|
The sentences are difficult to read aloud because they sound awkward, are distractingly repetitive, or difficult to understand.
|
|
All sentences are well-constructed with varied structure.
|
Most sentences are well-constructed with varied structure.
|
Most sentences are well-constructed but have a similar structure.
|
Sentences lack structure and appear incomplete or rambling.
|
|
There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is supported by detailed information.
|
Main idea is clear but the supporting information is general.
|
Main idea is somewhat clear but there is a need for more supporting information.
|
The main idea is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information.
|
|
Relevant, telling, quality details give the reader important information that goes beyond the obvious or predictable.
|
Supporting details and information are relevant, but one key issue or portion of the storyline is unsupported.
|
Supporting details and information are relevant, but several key issues or portions of the storyline are unsupported.
|
Supporting details and information are typically unclear or not related to the topic.
|
|
The writer seems to be writing from knowledge or experience. The author has taken the ideas and made them "his own."
|
The writer seems to be drawing on knowledge or experience, but there is some lack of ownership of the topic.
|
The writer relates some of his own knowledge or experience, but it adds nothing to the discussion of the topic.
|
The writer has not tried to transform the information in a personal way. The ideas and the way they are expressed seem to belong to someone else.
|
|
The reader's questions are anticipated and answered thoroughly and completely.
|
The reader's questions are anticipated and answered to some extent.
|
The reader is left with one or two questions. More information is needed to "fill in the blanks".
|
The reader is left with several questions.
|
|
The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is "getting at."
|
The conclusion is recognizable and ties up almost all the loose ends.
|
The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up several loose ends.
|
There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends.
|