|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clear, well-developed thesis; strong, logical argument
|
Thesis is clear but could be stronger; argument mostly logical
|
Thesis is present but weak; argument lacks depth
|
No clear thesis; weak or illogical argument
|
|
|
Uses 5+ credible sources; strong integration of research
|
Uses 4-5 credible sources; adequate research integration
|
Uses 3-4 sources, but some may not be credible; minimal research integration
|
Fewer than 3 sources; little to no credible research
|
|
|
Logical structure; smooth transitions; strong intro and conclusion
|
Mostly logical structure; transitions could be smoother
|
Some structural issues; weak intro or conclusion
|
Lacks organization; no clear introduction or conclusion
|
|
|
Strong, insightful analysis; acknowledges counterarguments
|
Good analysis; considers counterarguments
|
Some analysis but mostly summary; minimal counterarguments
|
Little to no analysis; no counterarguments addressed
|
|
|
Few to no grammar/spelling errors; strong academic tone
|
Some minor errors; mostly academic tone
|
Noticeable errors; inconsistent tone
|
Frequent errors; informal or unclear writing
|
|
|
Correct use of APA/MLA; properly formatted citations
|
Mostly correct formatting; minor citation errors
|
Some formatting issues; inconsistent citations
|
Incorrect or missing citations; poor formatting
|