|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) is imaginative, taking into account the complexities of an issue. Limits of position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) are acknowledged. Others' points of view are synthesized within position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis).
|
Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) takes into account the complexities of an issue. Others' points of view are acknowledged within position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis).
|
Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) acknowledges different sides of an issue.
|
Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) is stated, but is simplistic and obvious.
|
|
Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation, to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
|
Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
|
Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
|
Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/ evaluation.
|
|
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering relevant information necessary for full understanding.
|
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated, described and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions.
|
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds unknown.
|
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated without clarification or description.
|
|
Conclusions and related outcomes (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect student's informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.
|
Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information, including opposing viewpoints; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly.
|
Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion); some related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly.
|
Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are oversimplified.
|