| 
				
			 | 
			
				
			 | 
			
				
			 | 
			
				
			 | 
			
				
			 | 
			
		
			
		
			| 
				
			 | 
			
				 
			Interesting, well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Relatively interesting, rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Delivery not smooth, but able to hold audience attention most of the time.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost.
				 
			 | 
			
		
			
		
			| 
				
			 | 
			
				 
			Rough draft brought on due date. Student shares with peer and extensively edits based on peer feedback.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Rough draft brought on due date. Student shares with peer and peer makes edits.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Provides feedback and/or edits for peer, but own rough draft was not ready for editing.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Rough draft not ready for editing and did not participate in reviewing draft of peer.
				 
			 | 
			
		
			
		
			| 
				
			 | 
			
				 
			No misspellings or grammatical errors.Complex language and lexis.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors. Good use of language and lexis.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors. Simple language.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			More than 4 gross errors in spelling or grammar. Elementary language but requires effort (sforzo) to understand.
				 
			 | 
			
		
			
		
			| 
				
			 | 
			
				 
			Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors.
				 
			 | 
			
		
			
		
			| 
				
			 | 
			
				 
			Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Uses other  people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of  original thinking.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Uses other people's ideas, but  does not give them credit.
				 
			 | 
			
		
			
		
			| 
				
			 | 
			
				 
			The workload is divided and shared equally by all team members.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			The workload is divided and shared fairly by all team members, though workloads may vary from person to person.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			The workload was divided, but one person in the group is viewed as not doing his/her fair share of the work.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			The workload was not divided OR several people in the group are viewed as not doing their fair share of the work.
				 
			 | 
			
		
			
		
			| 
				
			 | 
			
				 
			Source information collected for all images, facts and quotes. All documented in desired format.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Source information collected for all images, facts and quotes. Most documented in desired format.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Source information collected for most images, facts and quotes, but not documented in desired format.
				 
			 | 
			
				 
			Very little or no source information was collected.
				 
			 |