|
|
Excellent reflection and insight throughout the paper. Provides specific, detailed examples.
|
Some points of insight. A few good, specific examples.
|
Adequate expression of ideas, though lacking in specific illustrations.
|
Limited degree of thinking. The ideas are insufficiently developed or a bit scattered.
|
Poor exploration of ideas. Off-topic or questionable thinking.
|
|
|
Few to no errors in grammar and mechanics.
|
A few minor errors in grammar and mechanics.
|
Some significant errors in grammar and mechanics, but not a pattern.
|
A pattern of serious errors in grammar and mechanics.
|
Numerous errors in grammar and mechanics disrupt the flow of ideas.
|
