|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent analysis. Makes insightful, independent observations and/or analysis.
|
Advanced facility of language. Excellent clarity and vocabulary.
|
May have some minor, insignificant errors in grammar and mechanics.
|
|
|
Good analysis. Offers good observations and/or analysis.
|
Good facility of language. Good control over the elements of language.
|
Some lapses in syntax or grammar.
|
|
|
Superficial or limited analysis. Makes obvious but valid observations.
|
Generally clear expression of writing.
|
May have some significant grammatical errors, but not a pattern that interferes with communication.
|
|
|
Inadequate analysis. Lack of evidence or faulty reasoning.
|
The reader must work hard to understand key points. Rambling ideas. Inconsistent control over the elements of language.
|
A pattern of grammatical errors interferes with communication (e.g., run-on sentences, fragments, awkward syntax, inappropriate word choice, etc.)
|
|
|
Incoherent analysis. Ideas are incongruous with the meaning of the passage.
|
Consistent weaknesses in control over writing. Significant distractions from the fluency of the writing.
|
Numerous and distracting errors reveal below grade-level writing.
|
