|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All articles have headlines that capture the reader's attention and accurately describe the content. All articles have a byline.
|
All articles have headlines that accurately describe the content. All articles have a byline.
|
Most articles have headlines that accurately describe the content. All articles have a byline.
|
Articles are missing bylines OR many articles do not have adequate headlines.
|
|
|
The articles contain facts, figures, and/or word choices that make the articles exceptionally interesting to readers. Relates clearly to the readers the writer's purpose.
|
The articles contain facts, figures, and/or word choices that make the articles interesting to readers. Relates what the writer's purpose.
|
The article contains some facts or figures but is marginally interesting to read. Somewhat relates
|
The article does not contain facts or figures that might make it interesting to read.
|
|
|
The information was accurate and there was a clear reason for including the editorial in the newspaper. Relates a clear, concise argument relating to Macbeth.
|
The information was accurate and there was a fairly good reason for including the editorial in the newspaper. Relates an argument relating to Macbeth, but it may not have a clear ending/point.
|
The information was occasionally inaccurate or misleading, but there was a clear reason for including the editorial in the newspaper. Relates an argument relating to Macbeth, but lacks supporting points
|
The information was typically inaccurate, misleading or libelous. Does not relate at all to Macbeth OR has no valid points OR is slanderous.
|
|
|
No spelling or grammar errors remain after one or more people [in addition to the editor] read and correct the newspaper.
|
A couple of spelling or grammar errors remain after one or more people [in addition to the editor] read and correct the newspaper.
|
No more than 3 spelling or grammar errors remain after one or more people [in addition to the editor] read and correct the newspaper.
|
Several spelling or grammar errors remain in the final copy of the newspaper.
|
|
|
Assignments were evenly divided, work was done in a timely manner, and everyone was heard through the group. Work divided worksheet was submitted.
|
Writing assignments were somewhat divided evenly, work was submitted in a timely manner, but listening skills weren't implemented. Work divided worksheet was submitted.
|
Writing assignments were not divided evenly - there was clearly one person doing most of the work. Work was not submitted in a timely manner, and no one listened. Work divided worksheet was not submitted.
|
One person did all of the work, assignments were submitted late [if at all] and everyone worked independently. Work divided worksheet was not submitted.
|
|
|
The presentation is very clear and highlights the essential parts of the newspaper
|
The presentation is mostly informative and highlights essential parts of the newspaper.
|
The presentation is somewhat informative and highlights some parts of the newspaper.
|
The presentation lacks crucial information from the newspaper and does not cover the information.
|
|
|
Pictures are in focus, well-cropped, and clearly relate to the articles they accompany. All pictures have captions that adequately describe the people and action in the graphic.
|
Pictures are in focus and are clearly related to the articles they accompany. All pictures have captions.
|
70-100% of the pictures are clearly related to the articles they accompany. Most pictures have captions.
|
More than 20% of the pictures are not clearly related to the articles OR no pictures were used OR many pictures do not have captions.
|
