|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arguments presented are mature, insightful, original and/or forceful. The evidence directly and convincingly supports the arguments made.
|
Arguments are persuasive and competently developed revealing serious consideration of the issue. Evidence selected supports the arguments made.
|
Arguments are generally sound, though they may lack in persuasiveness, are poorly expressed, or are not well developed. The position taken is adequately supported by the evidence used.
|
Arguments are either so scant, poorly developed or redundant that they may seem contradictory or overly simplistic. Evidence may apply to the issue, but not to the position taken.
|
|
|
Evidence used is detailed and convincingly supports arguments. Details given reveal a mature and insightful understanding of the issue. Examples are relevant and accurate.
|
Evidence is purposeful and usually specific, and reveal a competent understanding of the content its application to the assigned issue. Demonstrate a solid grasp of issues relating to psychology/sociology.
|
The examples reveal an adequate understanding of the issue. The examples are relevant, but may contain some minor conceptual errors. There is a mixture of relevant and extraneous detail.
|
Selected examples are unfocused, inappropriate and reveal a limited understanding of psychological/
sociological issues. Examples are potentially relevant, but contain so many inaccuracies that they demonstrate confusion or oversimplification.
|
|
|
All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong.
|
Most counter-arguments were accurate, relevant, and strong.
|
Most counter-arguments were accurate and relevant, but several were weak.
|
Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant
|
|
|
Team consistently used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience.
|
Team usually used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience.
|
Team sometimes used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience.
|
One or more members of the team had a presentation style that did not keep the attention of the audience.
|
