|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanation is detailed and clear.
|
Explanation is clear.
|
Explanation is a little difficult to understand, but includes critical components.
|
Explanation is difficult to understand and is missing several components OR was not included.
|
|
The work is presented in a neat, clear, organized fashion that is easy to read.
|
The work is presented in a neat and organized fashion that is usually easy to read.
|
The work is presented in an organized fashion but may be hard to read at times.
|
The work appears sloppy and unorganized. It is hard to know what information goes together.
|
|
Correct terminology and notation are always used, making it easy to understand what was done.
|
Correct terminology and notation are usually used, making it fairly easy to understand what was done.
|
Correct terminology and notation are used, but it is sometimes not easy to understand what was done.
|
There is little use, or a lot of inappropriate use, of terminology and notation.
|
|
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of geometric terms with precise and detailed desciptions beyond outline.
|
Demonstrates a clear understanding of geometric terms with desciptions as required from outline.
|
Demonstrates some understanding of geometric terms with desciptions as required from outline.
|
Demonstrates some understanding of geometric terms with desciptions as required from outline. Considerable help required.
|
|
Clear and careful construction of descriptive paragraph, using appropriate language and grammar.
|
Accurate construction of descriptive paragraph, using simple language and grammar.
|
Descriptive paragraph created, using simple language and grammar, with minor errors.
|
Descriptive paragraph created, using simple language and grammar, with major errors.
|