|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Several reputable background sources were used and cited correctly. Material is translated into student's own words.
|
A few reputable background sources are used and cited correctly. Material is translated into student's own words.
|
A few background sources are used and cited correctly, but some are not reputable sources. Material is translated into student's own words.
|
Material is directly copied rather than put into students own words and/or background sources are cited incorrectly.
|
|
|
The purpose of the lab or the question to be answered during the lab is clearly identified and stated.
|
The purpose of the lab or the question to be answered during the lab is identified, but is stated in a somewhat unclear manner.
|
The purpose of the lab or the question to be answered during the lab is partially identified, and is stated in a somewhat unclear manner.
|
The purpose of the lab or the question to be answered during the lab is erroneous or irrelevant.
|
|
|
Experimental design is a well-constructed test of the stated hypothesis.
|
Experimental design is adequate to test the hypothesis, but leaves some unanswered questions.
|
Experimental design is relevant to the hypothesis, but is not a complete test.
|
Experimental design is not relevant to the hypothesis.
|
|
|
Careful planning and practice of lesson is evident. Instruction was delivered with goals set, a hands on lesson, and closure.
|
Careful planning of the lesson is evident. Instruction was delivered with goals set, a hands on lesson, and closure.
|
Planning of the lesson was evident. Adequate level of instruction was delivered to students.
|
Little evidence of planning. Inadequate instruction.
|
