|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The student had notes about all the events and dates s/he wished to include in the exhibit before beginning to design the exhibit.
|
The student had notes about almost all the events and dates s/he wished to include in the exhibit before beginning to design the exhibit.
|
The student had notes about most (~75%) of the events and dates s/he wished to include in the exhibit before beginning to design the exhibit.
|
The student had not prepared adequate notes before beginning to design the exhibit.
|
|
|
All graphics are effective and balanced with text use.
|
All graphics are effective, but there appear to be too few or too many.
|
Some graphics are effective and their use is balanced with text use.
|
Several graphics are not effective.
|
|
|
Facts were accurate for all events reported in the exhibit.
|
Facts were accurate for almost all events reported in th exhibit.
|
Facts were accurate for most (~75%) of the events reported in the exhibit.
|
Facts were often inaccurate for events in the exhibit.
|
|
|
The overall appearance of the exhbit is pleasing and easy to read.
|
The overall appearance of the exhibit is somewhat pleasing and easy to read.
|
The exhibit is relatively pleasing.
|
The exhibit is difficult to follow.
|
|
|
Classroom time was used to work on the project. Conversations were not disruptive and focused on the work.
|
Classroom time was used to work on the project the majority of the time. Conversations were not disruptive and focused on the work.
|
Classroom time was used to work on the project the majority of the time, but conversations often were disruptive or did not focus on the work.
|
Student did not use classroom time to work on the project and/or was highly disruptive.
|
