|
|
|
|
|
|
Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material.
|
Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed.
|
Content is logically organized for the most part.
|
There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.
|
|
Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.
|
Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
|
Includes essential or basic information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors.
|
Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors.
|
|
Rough draft brought on due date. Student shares with peer and extensively edits based on peer feedback.
|
Rough draft brought on due date. Student shares with peer and peer makes edits.
|
Provides feedback and/or edits for peer, but own rough draft was not ready for editing.
|
Rough draft not ready for editing and did not participate in reviewing draft of peer.
|
|
No misspellings or grammatical errors.
|
Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors.
|
Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
|
More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar.
|
|
Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation.
|
Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation.
|
Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content.
|
Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presenation content.
|
|
Interesting, well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention.
|
Relatively interesting, rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention.
|
Delivery not smooth, but able to able to hold audience attention most of the time.
|
Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost.
|