|
|
|
|
|
|
Title slide is present, clearly identifies topic, creative and attractive.
|
Title slide is present, clearly identifies topic and attractive.
|
Title slide is present and clearly identifies topic.
|
Topic slide is missing.
|
|
Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is consistent from slide to slide.
|
Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is inconsistent from slide to slide.
|
Background does not enhance the presentation and takes away from the looks of the presentation.
|
Background colors/design are poorly chosen and make the slides hard to read.
|
|
Slides transition automatically and are well timed. The transitions are simple and consistent throughout the presentation.
|
Slides transition automatically however the timing is too slow or fast.
|
Slides transition automatically however the timing is too slow or too fast and the transitions are inconsistent.
|
Slides do not transition by themselves and the transitions are inconsistent which detracts from the quality of the presentation.
|
|
Animations occur automatically and are well planned. The animations add to the effectiveness of the presentation.
|
Animations occur automatically but they are too fast or too slow and do not add to the effectiveness of the presentation.
|
Animations occur automatically however the timing is too slow or too fast and the transitions are inconsistent.
|
Animations do not occur automatically and the transitions are inconsistent which detracts from the quality of the presentation.
|
|
All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
A few graphics are blurry but all support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
Presentation has fewer than five graphics.
|
|
Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content.
|
Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability.
|
Font formating has not been considered in order to enhance readability.
|
Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material.
|
|
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors but no misspellings.
|
Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors.
|
|
Overall the presentation is eye-catching and attractive and well designed.
|
Overall the presentation is somewhat well put together and attractive.
|
Overall the presentation is good but needs to be designed more effectively.
|
Overall the presentation is not attractive looking and is hard to understand.
|