|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facts lead you to acquire new knowledge and lead into further research or enquiry/inquiry.
|
Facts are relevant, offer excellent grasp of material, and shows comprehension of material
|
Shows evidence of understanding most of the major concepts and ideas
|
Has mostly shallow or limited grasp of the material
|
|
|
Questions posed to other students about their project
|
Questions are relevant, posed in a manner that displays good citizenship, and useful to the overall research project.
|
Questions are either poorly stated or not relevant, but useful to the overall project.
|
Questions are either poorly stated or not relevant, and may not necessarily be useful to the overall project.
|
|
|
Student positively critiques the work of others and has clearly worked hard to word his or her responses in a tactful manner.
|
Student positively critiques the work of others but could have worked harder to word his or her responses in a tactful manner.
|
Student seems unaware or uninterested in responding to others without being prompted.
|
Student offers inadequate or very low levels of support to positions of others.
|
|
|
Student uses complex, grammatically correct sentences regularly; demonstrates a high level of vocabulary; has rare misspellings.
|
Sentences are generally grammatically correct; occasional misspellings; spellchecker may not have been used.
|
Ideas are understood, but show signs of disorganization; frequent grammar and spelling errors.
|
Poor use of the language garbles much of the message; only an occasional idea is apparent; spellchecker and grammar check clearly not used.
|
|
|
Student expresses themselves very clearly and has formatted the online dialogue to aid understanding.
|
Clear expression of the language is demonstrated most of the time.
|
Clear expression of the language is sometimes evident. Some of the wording is vague and ambiguous.
|
Student does not express themselves clearly.
|
