|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contribution made withint the first 2 days of wiki availability
|
contribution made in the first week of availabilty
|
Made within sometime after the first week
|
No individual contribution made
|
|
|
More than 400 words
|
At least 250 words
|
Less than 250 words
|
no contribution
|
|
|
Individual contribution well written information flows well and is orgnaized in a logical manner
|
Individual contribution well written information flows well but orgnaization is a little scattered
|
Individual contribution not well written, information does not flow well and lacks organization
|
no contribution
|
|
|
Individual contribution is an important and needed contribution to help to fully explain the group's assigned topic
|
Individual contribution is on task for the group topic but is not really an important and needed contribution to help to fully explain the group's assigned topic
|
Individual contribution is interesting but totally off topic or not helpful in addressing the group's assigned topic.
|
no contribution made
|
|
|
Contribution written in his or her own words, does not use unnecessary direct quotes. Well done summaries
|
|
Most of Contribution written in his or her own words, but uses unnecessary direct quotes.
|
no contribution
|
|
|
Well written NO typos, unmatched verb tenses, or awkward or run-on sentences. everything spelled correctly and proper use of paragraphs
|
Paper has a problem with one of the components mentioned in the mastery level to the left.
|
Paper has a problem with two or more of the components mentioned in the mastery level to the left.
|
no contribution
|
|
|
Contribution effortless to read, easy to understand no flowery language or poor use of sentence structure
|
Contribution understood okay but flowery language or poor use of sentence structure makes it more of an effort to get the meaning of the material
|
Contribution difficult to understand take much effort to get through
|
no contribution
|
