|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accurate information taken from several sources in a systematic manner.
|
Accurate information taken from a couple of sources in a systematic manner.
|
Accurate information taken from a couple of sources but not systematically.
|
Information taken from only one source and/or information not accurate.
|
|
|
Structure demonstrates functions extraordinarily well, holds up under stresses.
|
Structure demonstrates functions well, holding up under most of the stresses.
|
Structure functions pretty well, but deteriorates under many of the stresses.
|
Fatal flaws in function with complete failure under the stresses.
|
|
|
Plan is neat with clear measurements and labeling for all components.
|
Plan is neat with clear measurements and labeling for most components.
|
Plan provides clear measurements and labeling for most components.
|
Plan does not show measurements clearly or is otherwise inadequately labeled.
|
|
|
Appropriate materials were selected and creatively modified in ways that made them even better.
|
Appropriate materials were selected and there was an attempt at creative modification to make them even better.
|
Appropriate materials were selected.
|
Inappropriate materials were selected and contributed to a product that performed poorly.
|
|
|
Great care taken in construction process so that the structure is neat, attractive and follows plans accurately.
|
Constuction was careful and accurate for the most part, but 1-2 details could have been refined for a more attractive product.
|
Construction accurately followed the plans, but 3-4 details could have been refined for a more attractive product.
|
Construction appears careless or haphazard. Many details need refinement for a strong or attractive product.
|
|
|
Explanations indicate a clear and accurate understanding of scientific principles underlying the construction.
|
Explanations indicate a relatively accurate understanding of scientific principles underlying the construction.
|
Explanations indicate relatively accurate understanding of scientific principles underlying the construction.
|
Explanations do not illustrate much understanding of scientific principles underlying the construction.
|
|
|
Report meets and exceeds requirements.
|
Report meets requirements.
|
Report meets some of the requirements.
|
Report does not meet requirements of comparing and contrasting 3 animals (vertebrate, invertebrate, exoskeleton) with the human eye, ear, and skeletal system.
|
|
|
Report is at least 2 pages typed, MLA, with another page of diagrams. It has no speeling or grammatical errors.
|
Report is 2 pages plus diagrams but has multiple spelling and gramatical errors.
|
Report is not the complete 2 pages or is missing the diagrams, or it is hard to follow.
|
Report is only a page without diagrams, or is not typed or in MLA format.
|