|
|
|
|
|
|
The introduction is inviting, makes a clear thesis statetment and previews the structure of the paper.
|
The introduction clearly states the thesis and previews the structure of the paper, but is not particularly inviting to the reader.
|
The introduction states the thesis, but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper nor is it particularly inviting to the reader.
|
There is no clear introduction of the main topic or structure of the paper.
|
|
There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is supported by detailed information.
|
Main idea is clear but the supporting information is general.
|
Main idea is somewhat clear but there is a need for more supporting information.
|
The main idea is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information.
|
|
At least 5 quotes are effectively used to support the thesis.
|
At least 3 quotes are effectively used to support the thesis.
|
Three or fewer quotes are used which may or may not effectively support the thesis.
|
Quotes are either not used or not effective in supporting the thesis.
|
|
Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader. Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas are connected.
|
Details are placed in a logical order, but the way in which they are presented/introduced sometimes makes the writing less interesting. Transitions clearly show how ideas are connected , but there is little variety.
|
Some details are not in a logical or expected order, and this distracts the reader. Some transitions work well; but ideas betwee other ideas are fuzzy.
|
Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized. Transitions are unclear or nonexistant.
|
|
The pacing is well-controlled. The writer knows when to slow down and elaborate, and when to pick up the pace and move on.
|
The pacing is generally well-controlled but the writer occasionally does not elaborate enough.
|
The pacing is generally well-controlled but the writer sometimes repeats the same point over and over, or spends too much time on details that don't matter.
|
The pacing often feels awkward to the reader. The writer elaborates when there is little need, and then leaves out necessary supporting information.
|
|
Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind, and the choice and placement of the words seems accurate, natural and not forced.
|
Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind, but occasionally the words are used inaccurately or seem overdone.
|
Writer uses words that communicate clearly, but the writing lacks variety, punch or flair.
|
Writer uses a limited vocabulary that does not communicate strongly or capture the reader's interest. Jargon or cliches may be present and detract from the meaning.
|
|
All sentences are well-constructed. Essay contains simple, compound, complex and compound-complex sentences.
|
|
Most sentences are well-constructed but one or more structures are not used.
|
Sentences lack structure and appear incomplete, awkward or rambling.
|
|
Writer makes no errors in capitalization or punctuation, so the paper is exceptionally easy to read.
|
Writer makes 1 or 2 errors in capitalization or punctuation, but the paper is still easy to read.
|
Writer makes a few errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and interrupt the flow.
|
Writer makes several errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and greatly interrupt the flow.
|
|
Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
|
Paper is double spaced, neatly written in cursive, or typed in 12 pt font with no distracting corrections. Complete heading and title are used.
|
Paper is double spaced, neatly written or typed in 12 pt font with 1 or 2 distracting corrections. Title and complete heading are present.
|
The writing is generally readable, but the reader has to exert quite a bit of effort to figure out some of the words. Heading or title may be incomplete
|
Many words are unreadable OR there are several distracting corrections OR complete heading OR title are missing.
|
|
The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is "getting at."
|
The conclusion is recognizable and ties up almost all the loose ends.
|
The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up several loose ends.
|
There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends.
|