|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The introduction is inviting, states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper.
|
The introduction clearly states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper, but is not particularly inviting to the reader.
|
The introduction states the main topic, but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper nor is it particularly inviting to the reader.
|
There is no clear introduction of the main topic or structure of the paper.
|
|
|
Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader.
|
Details are placed in a logical order, but the way in which they are presented/introduced sometimes makes the writing less interesting.
|
Some details are not in a logical or expected order, and this distracts the reader.
|
Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized.
|
|
|
All supportive facts are reported accurately.
|
Almost all supportive facts are reported accurately.
|
Most supportive facts are reported accurately.
|
NO facts are reported OR most are inaccurately reported.
|
|
|
Relevant, telling, quality details give the reader important information that goes beyond the obvious or predictable.
|
Supporting details and information are relevant, but one key issue or portion of the storyline is unsupported.
|
Supporting details and information are relevant, but several key issues or portions of the storyline are unsupported.
|
Supporting details and information are typically unclear or not related to the topic.
|
|
|
There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is supported by detailed information.
|
Main idea is clear but the supporting information is general.
|
Main idea is somewhat clear but there is a need for more supporting information.
|
The main idea is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information.
|
