|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is consistent from card to card and is appropriate for the topic.
|
Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is consistent from card to card.
|
Background does not detract from text or other graphics.
|
Background makes it difficult to see text or competes with other graphics on the page.
|
|
|
Graphics are hand-drawn. The illustrator(s) are given credit somewhere in the presentation.
|
A combination of hand-drawn and stock graphics are used. Sources are documented in the presentation for all images.
|
Some graphics are from sources that clearly state that non-commercial use is allowed without written permission. Sources are documented in the presentation for all "borrowed" images.
|
Some graphics are borrowed from sites that do not have copyright statements or do not state that non-commercial use is allowed, OR sources are not documented for all images.
|
|
|
Presentation shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way.
|
Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way.
|
Presentation shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on 1-2 cards.
|
Presentation is a rehash of other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought.
|
|
|
Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content.
|
Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability.
|
Font formatting has been carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read.
|
Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material.
|
|
|
All content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors.
|
Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that might be inaccurate.
|
The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate.
|
Content is typically confusing or contains more than one factual error.
|
|
|
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors but no misspellings.
|
Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors.
|
|
|
Information is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of material that might be on the next card.
|
Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. One card or item of information seems out of place.
|
Some information is logically sequenced. An occasional card or item of information seems out of place.
|
There is no clear plan for the organization of information.
|
|
|
All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
A few graphics are not attractive but all support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation.
|
|
|
Project includes all material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the topic. It is a highly effective study guide.
|
Project includes most material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the material but is lacking one or two key elements. It is an adequate study guide.
|
Project is missing more than two key elements. It would make an incomplete study guide.
|
Project is lacking several key elements and has inaccuracies that make it a poor study guide.
|
