|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presentation shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way.
|
Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way.
|
Presentation shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on 1-2 cards.
|
Presentation is a rehash of other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought.
|
|
|
Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content.
|
Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability.
|
Font formatting has been carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read.
|
Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material.
|
|
|
All content throughout the presentation is accurate. Three graphs were imbedded in the presentation. There are no factual errors.
|
Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that might be inaccurate. Two graphs were imbedded in the presentation.
|
The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate. One graph was imbedded in the presentation.
|
Content is typically confusing or contains more than one factual error.
|
|
|
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors but no misspellings.
|
Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors.
|
|
|
Prezi includes all material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the topic. It is coordinated with the written report.
|
Prezi includes most material needed to understand the report but is lacking one or two key elements. It is somewhat coordinated with the written report.
|
Prezi is NOT coordinated with the written report, yet it is done well.
|
Prezi is lacking any connection with the read report.
|
