|
|
Journal gives insight into what the reader was thinking about what while reading.
|
Most of the journal shares reader's thoughts about what they were thinking about reading. Additionally, there is some retelling of the story
|
The journal contains a lot of retelling about the story, but has some good comments about what the reader was thinking while reading as well.
|
The journal is nearly entirely a retelling of the story. There is almost no insights into what the reader was thinking while reading.
|
|
|
1 handwritten page of journaling for every 50 pages of reading. (Mrs. J. will make conversions for word processed journals.)
|
1 handwritten page or journaling for every 60 pages of reading. (Mrs. J. will make conversions for word processed journals.)
|
1 handwritten page or journaling for every 70 pages of reading. (Mrs. J. will make conversions for word processed journals.)
|
Less than 1/2 page of journaling for every 50 pages of reading.
|
|
|
Title & author clearly indicated on top of each page of journal.
Student's name in top right corner of each journal page.
Date indicated for each journal entry.
The journal is ongoing during reading process.
Penmanship is reader-friendly.
|
Title & author is included on the journal, but not every page w/ consistancy.
Reader's name included on journal.
Date indicated for each journal entry.
Penmanship is reader-friendly.
|
Title & author not clearly indicated on top of each page of journal.
Student's name in top right corner of each journal page.
Date is not indicated for each journal entry.
The journal was completed when reading was finished.
Penmanship is difficult.
|
Title & author is not clearly indicated.
Student's name is difficult to fine.
Date of journaling not included.
Journal appears to have been written when reading was completed.
Penmanship difficlut.
|
