|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The main characters are named and clearly described (through words and/or actions). The audience knows and can describe what the characters look like and how they typically behave.
|
The main characters are named and described (through words and/or actions). The audience has a fairly good idea of what the characters look like.
|
The main characters are named. The audience knows very little about the main characters.
|
It is hard to tell who the main characters are.
|
|
|
It is very easy for the audience to understand what problem the main character(s) face and why it is a problem.
|
It is fairly easy for the audience to understand what problem the main character(s) face and why it is a problem.
|
It is fairly easy for the audience to understand what problem the main character(s) face and but it is not clear why it is a problem.
|
It is not clear what problem the main character(s) face.
|
|
|
The solution to the problem is easy-to-understand and is logical. There are no loose ends.
|
The solution to the problem is easy-to-understand and is somewhat logical.
|
The solution to the problem was a little hard to understand.
|
No solution was attempted or it was impossible to understand.
|
|
|
Uses 3 or more web resources and the story map is well developed.
|
Uses 2 or more web resources and the story map is complete.
|
Used only 1 web resource and the story map is not finished.
|
Did not use any web resources and the story map was not started.
|
|
|
Storyteller looks at and tells the story to all members of the audience. Uses an excellent voice volume.
|
Storyteller looks at and tells the story to a few people in the audience. Voice volume is okay.
|
Storyteller looks at and tells the story to 1-2 people in the audience. Voice volume is hard to hear.
|
Storyteller does not look at or try to involve the audience. Voice volume is unintelligible.
|