Rubric Made Using:

RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )

CATEGORY

4

3

2

1

INTRODUCTION

The presenters make a very interesting presentation about what the interview is about and make a connection to other programmes alike.

The presenters make an interesting presentation about what the interview is about with no connection to other interviews alike.

The presenters introduce what the interview is about but they don\\\\\\'t make it interesting enough.

There is no introduction to the interview.

HERO BACKGROUND

Hero/heroine background, powers, real life, heroic moments and future plans come out clearly and organized in the interview.

Hero/heroine background, powers, real life, heroic moments and future plans come out in the interview although not very well organized.

Some contents about the hero/heroine : background, powers, real life, heroic moments and future plans are not present in the interview.

Some contents appear, but not all of them and not organized.

WITNESS TESTIMONY

The witness explains clearly and creatively what happened, what the hero/heroine was wearing, what he/she did and how the story ended.

The witness explains what happened, what the hero/heroine was wearing, what he/she did and how the story ended mostly clearly and correctly.

The witness explains what happened, what the hero/heroine was wearing, what he/she did and how the story ended but somehow disorganized or incomplete.

It is difficult to understand what happened by the testimony.

FAREWELL

The presenters conclude the interview summarizing ALL key facts and thanking both interviewees.

The presenters conclude the interview summarizing some key facts and thanking both interviewees.

The presenters vaquely summarized key information before thanking both interviewees.

No conclusion is provided.

Questions & Answers

Excellent, in-depth questions were asked by host and excellent answers supported by facts were provided by all talk show members.

Questions requiring factual answers were asked by the host and correct, in-depth answers were provided by all talk show members.

Questions requiring factual answers were asked by the host and correct answers were provided by several of the talk show members.

Answers were provided by only 1-2 talk show members.

Knowledge

All students showed excellent knowledge of content, needing no cues and showing no hesitation in talking or answering questions.

All students showed excellent knowledge of content, but 1-2 students once needed note cards to talk or answer questions.

Most students showed excellent knowledge of content, but 1-2 often needed note cards to talk or answer questions.

Most students needed note cards to talk and to answer questions.

Length of Podcast

Podcast was 12-10 minutes long.

Podcast was 10-8 minutes long.

Podcast was 8-6 minutes long.

Podcast was less than 6 or more than 15 minutes long.

Interest and Purpose

Podcast has a clear and interesting purpose.

Podcast is interesting but Hero purpose is somewhat unclear.

Podcast is not very interesting and hero purpose is somewhat unclear.

Podcast is not interesting and has no hero purpose.

VOCABULARY

The Podcast contains rich and appropriate vocabulary.

The Podcast contains mostly correct vocabulary.

The Podcast contains poor vocabulary.

The podcast is difficult to be understood for lack of vocabulary

GRAMMAR

Very good grammar: Past Tenses correctly used, pronouns, position of adjectives...

Good grammar in general: Past Tenses mostly correctly used, pronouns, position of adjectives...

Poor grammar: Past Tenses not correctly used, pronouns, position of adjectives...

Poor grammar makes it difficult to understand: Past Tenses not used, incorrect pronouns, incorrect position of adjectives...