Rubric Made Using:

RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )

CATEGORY

4 EXCELLENT

3 GOOD

2 OK

1 POOR

TASK - CONTENT

Your WebQuest (WQ) or Webtask (WT) is well planned from the linguistic point of view, with clear linguistic and non-linguistic elements. Besides, the final task proposed is meaningful for the students.

Your WebQuest or Webtask is well planned from the linguistic point of view, with clear linguistic and non-linguistic elements.

Your WQ or WT is sufficiently planned as to linguistic and non linguistic objectives, but it does not seem to be interesting from a pedagogical perspective and the activities are very traditional.

It is evident that you have copied and pasted your content from somewhere on the Web, or your WQ or WT is not linguistically oriented and does not aim at any linguistic objectives.

TASK - USE OF TECHNOLOGY

The implementation of the final task and activities of the proposed WQ or WT implies that pupils will need to make use of new technology, not only to search for information, but also for the generation of the final product. Additionally, the tasks requires that learners to into practice most of the language skills.

The implementation of the final task and activities of the proposed WQ or WT implies that pupils will make use of new technology: they will not only need to search for information, but also to put into practice some language skills.

The use of technology that you propose implies only search on the Web, but not the use of further technological applications.

Your WQ or QT could be done without using technology, and therefore technology is not a relevant component in its implementation.

SCAFFOLDING

You have included useful scaffolding in the process required to complete your WQ or WT.

 

 

There is no scaffolding at all.

PRESENTATION- wiki

Your WQ or WT is clearly organised and presented on the Wiki. Information and links are relevant. You have included visual and audio resources to make it more attractive for the pupils. You have included a page with relevant details such as students’ age, grade or the objectives guiding the task.

 

 

The presentation of the WQ and WT in the wiki is poor and disorganised. You have included no visual and audio resources.